Deaccessioning: When Museums Trade Old for New
Artemis and Stag
de-ac-ces-sion (v. t.)
To remove and sell (a work of art) from a museum's collection, especially in order to purchase other works of art.
Recently, the Albright-Knox Art Gallery, the principal museum of Buffalo, New York, decided to sell a number of important art works in its permanent collection with the intent of "acquiring and exhibiting art of the present."
Among the works that will be "traded up" are:
1. Artemis and Stage, a greco-roman statue
2. An ancient Chinese Bronze (there are only a handful in the world)
3 A life-size, Tenth-century statue of the god Shiva, that a Sotheby's specialist told the Associated Press is "the most important Indian sculpture ever to appear on the market."
In addition, many paintings by old masters will be auctioned off.
Tom L. Freudenheim, a former Museum Director and a current member of the Association of Art Museum Directors (AAMD), grew up in Buffalo. He wrote an article published in the Wall Street Journal condemning the move by the Art Gallery to sell its collection:
Museums are devoting more and more resources to acquiring large amounts of contemporary art, work about which the judgment of history -- supposedly what museums are all about -- is far from settled. Such acquisition policies may be acceptable, but not when done by getting rid of masterpieces whose importance has been validated by time and critical opinion and that provide a context for the work of the present. Ironically, this plan is driven by perceptions about the notably erratic and currently inflated contemporary art market, rather than by any dire financial crisis.
The message is, once again, that those entrusted with the sacred task of safeguarding our public patrimony have become as irresponsible as the money-grubbing executives who have given corporate America such a bad name. The works of art in the Albright-Knox Art Gallery don't belong to the directors or curators, who move in and out of communities as job opportunities present themselves. Nor are they the property of the trustees, who are meant to hold them in trust for the people of Buffalo, but who now show that they cannot be trusted.
It's hard not to agree with Mr. Freudenheim; however, I took a few minutes to visit the Albright-Knox website for their side of the story, and, while they did not offer any information on the upcoming deaccessioning auction, they did have a mission statement that seemed to support their actions:
The Albright-Knox Art Gallery, one of the nationâ€™s oldest public arts organizations, has a clear and compelling mission to acquire, exhibit, and preserve both modern and contemporary art. It focuses especially on contemporary art, with an active commitment to taking a global and multidisciplinary approach to the presentation, interpretation, and collection of the artistic expressions of our times. In an enriching, dynamic, and vibrant environment that embraces diverse cultures and traditions, the Gallery seeks to serve a broad and far-reaching audience.
To validate that this has always been their policy, I used Archive.org's Way Back Maching to find out whether or not this is a recent mission statement or long-stated goal. Sure enough, this has always been their statement.
The question then becomes, not "why are they selling these priceless items?" but, with an emphasis on contemporary art, "why did they ever acquire these old, priceless pieces in the first place?"